The Zoner has moved!

If you are not redirected automatically within a few seconds then click the link!



Phil Garner was all mad at his team for failing to put the ball in play and scoring runs. In today's Trib, Dave Van Dyck analyzes Game 4 inning by inning.

He wrote about Garner choosing--again--to bunt in the 1st inning. "Phil Garner was playing for one run early, which is a good idea the way his team has been hitting. So Willy Taveras sacrifices Craig Biggio to second. But Lance Berkman strikes out and Morgan Ensberg bounces out." That's twice in 2 nights that didn't work. Van Dyck says it's the right move. No way.

It's the exact opposite of what he should be doing. Guys who are in a funk don't need to be hitting with men in scoring position and 2 outs, down 3 games to zip in the World Series. It's added pressure. You need a big inning. Big innings release pressure and restore confidence. Why would you be playing for one run in the 1st inning? What happens in game 3 if Garner does not give away an out? Do they score 2, 3 or 4? Does the game go to 14? What about last night? Suppose they get a hit or two and score one or two that way--how are they feeling about themselves then? Much was made of the Sox sweeping with a run differential of only 6 in the 4 games. Well Garner is a huge part of that.

No comments: